[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by ricechex

Well, bringing up the short acronym u is hardly the discussion. oh man. Immunity man. Immunity to telecoms for illegal wiretapping, and therefore, no way to hold admin accountable. That's it.

but ultimately the government is the one responsible for this shit-- the telecoms take their marching orders from the government. barring some negligence or abuse, why should they be held accountable for cooperating with the commander guy?

it's a grey area at best-- i think the telecoms would be made scapegoats while the real culprits laugh their way to the bank.