View Single Post
Old 06.20.2008, 03:05 AM   #102
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,731
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cantankerous
the argument is about whether new bands can be called post punk

i say NO, because the term is used solely to describe bands that came directly after the "punk explosion" in the 70s and because there is no specific SOUND associated with post punk, bands today cannot be classified as post punk because the term is used to describe an era.

no, i mean, what the fuck are you arguing FOR.

are you trying to win the argument to make yourself look good? then yeah you're a pretentious shit.

are you tring to win the argument to make the other person look stupid? then you're just an egalitarian!
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|