View Single Post
Old 03.25.2008, 02:29 PM   #35
pbradley
invito al cielo
 
pbradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SoKo
Posts: 10,621
pbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's assespbradley kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous
if you can't kill yourself for physical or technical reasons, perhaps you dont really have such a right to begin with?
Wait, so a person who would commit suicide with their own hand but is physically incapable of doing thus loses the right to suicide? What if the person, in their choice to die, refuses to eat but the doctors hook them up to an intravenous feeding mechanism? The doctor would be assisting the suicide if the doctor respected the patient's choice not to eat. The mechanism is forced life in this instance.

Also I'm not going to address a slippery slope argument. I'm concern with it out of principle. Agree with the principle or not, application is another matter.
pbradley is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|