Quote:
|
Originally Posted by avantgarde1
lol, oh i'm totally an idiot, but that doesn't make atari right. i just like really simplistic shit... i love the sound of guitar feedback. it's a hobby i do from time to time for fun. and i do know chords, there's even a few songs i can actually play all the way thru! gasp! i just prefer to to play "textural sound" (love that phrase by the way) stuff more.
i feel all important that peopel are talking about me in a thread when i wasn't even in it! what's really funny is i clicke don this thread thinking it was gonna have atari in here spewing some type of trash talk... and whaddya know... i was totally right!
|
Nah dude - you might articulate yourself differently, but I would suggest from your response here (cf. what Drone posted) that you're interested in some things that are not 'conventional' modes of playing the guitar.
If anyone would forgive me the diversion of the thread - I'm currently quite fascinated with the idea that a great many kiddies at the moment (apologies if that seem patronising) seem to have grown up with music like SY and your Wolf Eyes or Throbbing Gristle and such that allude to your Rowes, Baileys, Takayanagis who, in turn, support themselves with your Scelsis, Xenakises and particularly Cages or Takemitsus. The point being that there's people who have little appreciation of tonal music who are interested in the 'pure texture' [non-sequiter] as
technique or
practice of whose precursors/ narratives they are unaware.
Now, the question is how to constitute, formally, qualias for such a 'pure texture' music if it is absolved of its tonal roots (which Xenakis et al met by extension of Schoenberg, not by 'pure' intuition).
I can elaborate, if I can be fucked, tomorrow. Having said that, it's much more likely none of you fuckers care.