|
[quote=khchris(original)]1. Nobody said NAFTA was the "outsourcing boom that it is today". Nobody. I never said it . Nobody except yourself says this. I totally agree. Today's "outsourcing" is a much bigger problem than when Clinton got NAFTA passed. NAFTA opened the floodgates to "outsourcing". But, I guess your "online degree" didn't teach you that.(giggles)
Duh. What's the argument?
THANK U. God, thank u. YES, this is what i said originally. U DON'T REALIZE IT, but your frenzy to argue and fabricate things out of quotes, made up quotes, and out of context statements, allowing yr political bias to muddy things, is what led to this ridichulous debate. wE'RE FINALLY GETTING SOMEWHERE.
What I said was that NAFTA "STARTED" the trigger effect of outsourcing(keyword: S-T-A-R-T-E-D)
FINE, AGREED. haha..but i was never arguing that. I know bush didn't START outsourcing. I NEVER SAID THAT!
2. Honda was much more popular in the 80s than it was in the 70s. This is just retarded because that goes without saying. It's obvious. What I said was Honda's popularity STARTED(KEYWORD: S-T-A-R-T-E-D) in the 70s, not the 80s. Honda was already becoming popular by the time the 80s came around. (giggles)
FINE, HOLY SHIT, AGREED. IT WaS ONLY THE START! HONDA WAS MUCH MORE POUPULAR in the 80's . U SAID IT YRSELF.
I WAS ONLY CONCERNED WITH THE HIGH POINTS, THE BOOM, THE EXPLOSION, OF OUTSOURCING, AND THE JAPANESE CAR INVASION.
THOSE TWO THINGS ARE THE ONLY THINGS I WAS ARGUING! AFTER ALL THIS TIME, U WERE ARGUING SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN WHAT I SAID. U ATTACKED MY ORIGINAL STATEMENTS, AND WERE ARGUING SOMETHING DIFFERENT, B/C I GUESS U LIKE TO ARGUE.
__________________
|