Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pbradley
Not exactly. One is the act of improving and the other is accomplishing the matter. It's a principle of most religions that people are never perfect. The self-satisfied have come to terms with their imperfections to where they feel they no longer need to improve. Those don't need religion and spoil it if they are (generally ending up like as described in Sonicl's post).
I, however, am self-satisfied in my spiritual/moral/whatever concerns (not smug but having no emptiness or inner conflict) so I don't feel the need to be of a religion.
|
Religion should only be for the unsatisfied? Use it as a tool for enlightenment and self-satisfaction, and then fuck it off once that goal is acheived?
The whole point of religion is pacifism and peace for everything, most religious folk and groups don't get this though.