Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cryptowonderdruginvogue
i dont see anything wrong with gays having some sort of "union" with the same rights as those who are married, but "marriage" should be between a man and a woman.
just my 2 cents.
|
A "union" that grants gay couples the same rights as married couples would then technically be a marriage because IT WOULD BE THE EXACT SAME THING AS A MARRIAGE. It seems like you have a problem with the
word "marriage" being used to describe the union of a gay couple, as opposed to a problem with wanting to separate "marriage" from "union" because of a deeper meaning "marriage" might have. Or is it a Church issue?
Basically what I'm saying is that your post is whack.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui7pfVXFUqM