View Single Post
Old 08.09.2006, 04:59 AM   #9
truncated
invito al cielo
 
truncated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,607
truncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's assestruncated kicks all y'all's asses
If I ever hear the phrase 9/11 again, I will puncture my own eardrums.

Do I support Bush's international policies post-9/11? No. However, I don't think a less confrontational approach would have, at the time, satisfied the majority of constituents. We are a reactionary nation; we want blood for blood, and, more often, blood for nothing.

One thing to keep in mind is that Bush's stance was in response to the mindset of his electing body. How can we technically blame Bush for simply giving the public what it wanted?

We're AMERICANS, goddammit! Ain't no towel-heads gonna trespass on our land! Git! *Nicely punctuated by a stream of tobacco juice between gapped front teeth*

Conspiracy theory my ass. Liberals trying to look clever. Michael Moore deserves to be shot. Just like, insofar as it's possible in the realm of humanity, the U.S. very much 'deserved' 9/11. I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner.

I don't like Bush, but I dislike radical, self-important leftists even more.
truncated is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|