View Single Post
Old 12.02.2010, 06:56 PM   #143
demonrail666
invito al cielo
 
demonrail666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
demonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's asses
I can't speak for the rest of the world but a significant factor in England's current problem was the abolition of the grants scheme in 1999. Students paid nothing but were far more rigorously vetted. What replaced it was a market system where if you were willing to pay (via a loan), you were pretty much guaranteed a place. This inflated the number of students going into higher education but could be seen as marking a certain level of dumbing down, as universities had to accomodate a far more mixed level of ability. This problem was further compunded by New Labour's silly idea of putting 50% of the population into higher education regardless of whether they'd benefit from it from a vocational point of view or would actually be able to deal with it on an intellectual level. I work in a university and I can honestly say that a large percentage if people there simply shouldn't be. Universities do need downscaling but it should be done in such a way that doesn't compromise their availability to those who can cope with its demands. In essence, bring back university grants.
demonrail666 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|