|
nucliar plants not safe, alternative solar or fusion reactor
researchers who worked on nucliar plants say it's unsafe
'one day it's gonna go wrong and bring large problems for the outside world' how many gonna die 1 million people, poor, rich, young, old, famous, unfamous and the many years after that if we have alternative for energy and the majority of the people want a safe and clean future they need to make the step towards solar energy, cars on airpressure that are now out yes a car on airpressure, clean air for everyone fusion reactors can be also a clean alternative the people don't need to follow the industry the people need to follow a clean and safe future for their childeren there is only a future in front of us and the childeren will look back and see the choises that we made today for them |
my favourite nukelear plant(s)
are the kind tha grow purple and big they have large mouth like a hippo that swallows mans like fly they first came from Venus but like small lizards in Tokyo bay giant form emerged form from foam not purple though more like geen but more toothsome and liek fish not man nukelear plants only eat mans solar plants are not as fierce they grow. stff liek to tomatoes and flowers to FEED mans so opposite sortof so YES. |
instead of poetry
there better can be a safty plan what regions will be effected and where the wind will blow nucliar clouds evacuations instead of looking forward to cash in money it's the future of childeren UNDERSTAND PLEASE |
the new and clear plan would be to go underground.
I once read there are a race of man living there. morlox they say. like apes they survived and actually worshipped the bombs! maybe they (through EVOLution) gained a knowledge that WE do not currently possess. a knowledge to worship. a knowledge of higher POWER. ghosts in the machines. power of the DEAD. |
i am going to kidnap gast and sacrifice him to the god uranium who lives in the cooling tower. we shall dance our pagan dance as we watch his body melt into the flames.
but seriously, i would be all in favour of an alternative energy source that ran off the bodies of the anti nuclear power crowd. i would be leading the secret police in breaking into their homes and smashing through the doors of their attics to round them up and take them off to be turned into fuel. |
you know what would be better than sex
politicians who are payed by the nucliar lobby to stop smiling next time they are on the TV we don't need your perversion a healty population is one where 80% of the people don't believe politicians |
fusion power doesn't yet exist
and probably wont for decades or more and cost trillions of dollars |
Quote:
i 'm not gonna argue on that it's not yet they are far with fusion reactor you don't see the future picture it can be used for the terra-forming of mars what is not ready is science fiction what is close to ready is the key in the door of the future |
No they are not "far" with a fusion reactor, the best projections put it at 50-70 years from now. Never mind the trillions of dollars it would cost.
Its no better than waiting for Carbon Sequestration and other so-called 'Clean Coal' technologies. Unknown unproven uncertain. And while twiddling your thumbs waiting to do nothing, there actions that can be taken right now today: Nuclear Power, low emission fossil fuels like Natural Gas, Public Transportation, etc. |
From: Cracked.com - http://www.cracked.com/article_18849_6-statistically-full-s2321t-dangers-media-loves-to-hype_p2.html
What's More Dangerous Than Nuclear Power Plants? Every Other Kind of Power Plant.
 It's hard to believe now, but nuclear energy was once a pretty promising and popular form of power. For a while in the 1950s, the design world was smitten with the atomic aesthetic, and everything kind of took on this spacey, futuristic look. Even toys got in on atomic energy fever:  Nuclear energy was literally all fun and games until a few meltdowns burst our atomic dream bubble. By the time Three Mile Island had its partial meltdown, most of the American public was terrified of powering even a toaster with something so insanely dangerous. From Three Mile on, it became so difficult to sell the public on nuclear energy that no new power plants have been built in the U.S. in 30 years.
Here's the thing, though. No one died as a result of the Three Mile Island disaster. No one even got injured or sick. The radiation released was the equivalent of one-sixth of a chest X-ray. In fact, even with nuclear power plants still in operation in the United States today, you and everyone who works in them still effectively have a 0 percent chance of dying from radiation poisoning.
While people did die at Chernobyl, and many people got sick, poor design and safety violations were so egregious and numerous that the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group published a 148-page report in 1993 detailing every possible thing that went wrong and how it could have been easily fixed. That doesn't change the fact that everyone around the accident got massively screwed in a big way, of course, but it seems that our initial estimates of the long-term damage of a nuclear event may have been exaggerated.  You call that a meltdown?
What You Should be Afraid of:
Every other source of energy. For example, coal kills more miners every few years than the initial blast at Chernobyl. This, of course, doesn't take into account air pollution from coal, which dwarfs those numbers yearly. But come on, that's not really surprising, is it? We know coal is bad for us -- that's why we're developing all these great green forms of energy. They're renewable and better for the environment. Unfortunately, they're actually not necessarily safer than nuclear energy for those involved in producing them. A study found that in Europe alone, wind energy has killed more people than nuclear energy and, worldwide, hydroelectric energy has, too. The leading cause of accidents involving wind energy farms is "blade failure," which is when a turbine blade breaks, sending shrapnel flying through the air.  With hydroelectric, of course, you get disasters and floods related to the dams.
Are we saying nuclear energy is the end-all, be-all next great power source? Is this article sponsored by a nuclear power conglomerate? Not as far as we know. We're just saying that sometimes it seems like we decide what we are going to be afraid of by drawing randomly from a hat. Read more: http://www.cracked.com/article_18849_6-statistically-full-s2321t-dangers-media-loves-to-hype_p2.html#ixzz16s0z5NsB |
an new eara of nano-tech is growing
things need to be simplefied why? we need to make choises that can give massive boost to our planet in a green way you make 1 cut and say from here we make things simple we only work for space explorations world wide follow that up strickt why? we need that to stay alive here on earth c'mon look at our planet how you're going to explain this we don't have no time to put this in a historical context you 'can' believe that we are designed to explore like evolution we're a part of evolution and that it's now time to explore other planets what we're also doing |
This is worse than tesla69, its barely coherent ramblings.
|
the reason i came back to this thread is that we never needed nucliar plants
if the world is going to be full with nucliar plants then more nucliar accidents will happen in the future, i think we never needed nucliar plants -all these nucliar desecions ar made above the head of the people with preprogrammed plans of multinations and politicians who put their signature under the approval of a nucliar plant the people who ar intelligent, green, future have no voice in this world |
nucliar
|
nular
|
nar
|
nauh
|
auh...
|
[quote=Lamont Cranston]
[img]http://www.ostrichheadinsand.com/images/ostrich-head-in-sand.jpg[\img] |
there are no nuclear power plants in my country.
which is a real threat. we badly need them. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth