Sonic Youth Gossip - post comething completely irrelevant!

Oh yeah, of course it's Kim-Jong. Kim is a public figure so it's completely different

Nevertheless I told him about the picture and he's on his way to your house. He looks annoyed.

ni'k	05.25.2010 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker

You're an idiot.

You say anyone has the right to do anything. This would imply that we could do things that would be considered cruel or immoral. You then go onto say that there might be consequences. Presumably these consequences would be retaliation etc. Imagine you have done something like this, something "immoral". So other people have decided they didn't want you to do this particular thing. Maybe they think you don't have the right to do this thing. In fact isn't that the basis for our desires for revenge or justice? That someone didn't have the right to do something. Maybe this retaliating person considers it their right to decide whether pictures of themselves appear on the internet or not.

People decide who has the right to do anything. My opinion is that we don't have the right to post pictures of other people without there consent.

So if someone beats you up you would think "well, that's they're right" and you wouldn't get angry? Of course your reply to that might be "I have the right to get angry and seek revenge" but if your own rights, such as your right to not get beaten up, haven't been transgressed (because anyone has right to do anything and these people have the right to beat you up, so your right to not get beaten up has been superseded in this instance) then on what basis exactly would you be angry?

IN OTHER WORDS:
whine whine whine i am a prissy little bitch with my impeccable moral motherfucking credentials dont disagree with my allmighty reason or i will condescend you to death.

Lurker

05.25.2010 12:50 PM

TAP TAP TAP

EVOLghost

05.25.2010 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker

TAP TAP TAP

Who the fuck is driving this bus?

edit: ps I know it ain't j00.

Dr. Eugene Felikson

05.25.2010 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker

My opinion is that we don't have the right to post pictures of other people without there consent.

:rolleyes:

I call bullshit on this. You know how many people have had their picture posted on this board without their consent? I mean, you might as well yell at Crypto for all the girls he poses with...or maybe prosecute us all for never consulting Lindsay Lohan before posting her image all over the board. It astounds me that some of you are taking this so seriously. Pardon me for providing the board with some decent eye candy to gel alongside my tales of lust, and slightly immoral desire.

EVOLghost

05.25.2010 04:18 PM

Pookie

05.25.2010 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EVOLghost

"On May 21 of 2010 Julio Aparicio Diaz suffered a very serious fuck when a bull gored him by the neck, leaving the bar at the mouth of the matador, and producing a large wound and the fracture of the maxilla."

EVOLghost

05.25.2010 04:33 PM

^yep. That's it.

ni'k	05.25.2010 04:47 PM

dood! did joo ask permisshun from the bull b4 u posted that? BECAUSE I DUNT THANK U DIDS!!!!!!!11

nicfit

05.25.2010 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ni'k

dood! did joo ask permisshun from the bull b4 u posted that? BECAUSE I DUNT THANK U DIDS!!!!!!!11

that's a pic of its "internet persona", so it's all good, innit?

ni'k	05.25.2010 05:13 PM

N0 U dunt undarstnd the morul dimenshuns invulvaed!!1 U msut reads lurksrs post 2 schol urself in the reflacted gluroy of his infalliballs morulisms!!!!11

Lurker

05.25.2010 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ni'k

N0 U dunt undarstnd the morul dimenshuns invulvaed!!1 U msut reads lurksrs post 2 schol urself in the reflacted gluroy of his infalliballs morulisms!!!!11

Says the communist.

ni'k	05.25.2010 05:44 PM

yeah because stalin and mao killed so many millions right? i must support that or something? when you're ready to stop ignoring capitalisms even greater and still continuing kill count go read moishe postone and understand how anything we've had so far doesn't come close to a true definition of communism and the stalins and maos of the world were actually still operating within capitalism, albeit their own twisted brand of it.

Dr. Eugene Felikson

05.25.2010 05:50 PM

I fully support both capitalism, and it's swine.

Lurker

05.25.2010 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ni'k

That's wasn't what I was talking about at all. I was referring to the irony of someone who takes such an extremely moral position (to the extent of sacrifice of the self) as communism and then accusing others of being moralistic and condescending.

ni'k	05.25.2010 06:05 PM

what? oh. yeah that's definitely possible to read from what you said.

is sacrifice of the self a moral position? fuck i just thought it was a relief.

that would mean you think self is immoral but you still want it. im confused. its ironic that im a communist and i ripped on you for you whinyness? what? its ironic that i take some sort of communist stance somehow and accuse you of moralism and condescension. right. great. fantastic. you've proved AGAIN that you know exactly what you are talking about.

space

05.25.2010 07:35 PM

although my 10km/90 minute treadmilling was fun, it feels as if my eyeballs are shrinking back into my head.

to top things off, we are out of laundry detergent and I'm being forced to go commando. sure, I've showered, but still...I feel like a savage.

right. time to go kill a pig or something.

!@#$%!

05.25.2010 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by space

static-harmony

05.25.2010 09:01 PM

I miss having a computer... Idk what's going on in the world.

dale_gribble

05.25.2010 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lurker

So if someone beats you up you would think "well, that's they're right" and you wouldn't get angry? Of course your reply to that might be "I have the right to get angry and seek revenge" but if your own rights, such as your right to not get beaten up, haven't been transgressed (because anyone has right to do anything and these people have the right to beat you up, so your right to not get beaten up has been superseded in this instance) then on what basis exactly would you be angry?

i may be angry at first but after thinking about it for a minute i'd just be disappointed in them for dong something i don't consider to be appropriate. are you a politician by chance?

atsonicpark

05.26.2010 12:53 AM